Enhancing plant defence: The role of mutualistic fungi in silicon-mediated pest resistance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33584/rps.18.2025.3843Abstract
Grasses have primarily coevolved with large grazing herbivores, a relationship that has strongly shaped their defensive architecture. This evolutionary history has led to the development of traits such as basal meristems and prolific tillering, enabling rapid regrowth following grazing. Consequently, grasses typically lack a diverse arsenal of chemical defences and instead rely on alternative strategies, including rapid tissue turnover, physical barriers, and symbiotic associations with microorganisms to deter insect herbivores. Microbial symbionts may provide chemical protection, while structural defences, such as silicon accumulation, play a key role. Silicon serves as a major structural defence against both biotic and abiotic stress, comprising up to 10% of grass dry mass. Many temperate grasses associate with mutualistic fungi, such as Epichloë endophytes and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, and these symbiotic plants can exhibit altered host chemistry, subsequently influencing herbivore interactions. However, few studies have investigated how silicon-based physical defences interact with these fungal symbionts and their chemical defence mechanisms. This research addressed this knowledge gap by examining how silicon, Epichloë, and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi interacted to affect plant resistance to insect herbivores. Two forage grasses (Festuca arundinacea and Lolium perenne) with contrasting leaf dynamics, were studied under factorial combinations of silicon supplementation, fungal inoculation (five novel grass-Epichloë associations [tall fescue: AR584 or common-toxic; perennial ryegrass: AR37, AR1, or common-toxic] or as Epichloë-free controls], and one arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal strain of Rhizophagus irregularis), and herbivore pressure from Helicoverpa armigera (a moth) and Rhopalosiphum padi (an aphid). Experiments showed that all Epichloë strains increased silicon concentrations in tall fescue on average to 31%. Of the five Epichloë strains in perennial ryegrass only strain AR37 had any effect increasing silicon concentrations. Silicon also enhanced Epichloë colonization (fungal mass) in tall fescue, but not in perennial ryegrass. In soil systems, silicon reduced the growth of H. armigera more effectively than any of the Epichloë strains, though both silicon and Epichloë contributed to plant defence in a compatible, non-antagonistic manner. In perennial ryegrass, silicon influenced Epichloë-derived alkaloid production, specifically epoxyjanthitrems. Scanning electron microscopy revealed that silicon and Epichloë could compatibly enhance surface defences and reduce insect feeding efficiency, while also compromising herbivore immunity. In a final experiment using only AR584 in tall grass fescue, tripartite interactions involving arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, Epichloë, and silicon were explored under aphid attack. While endophytes suppressed aphid performance, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi counteracted these effects, potentially through reduced alkaloid levels and increased foliar nitrogen. Silicon increased uptake in all symbiotic treatments but did not affect aphid performance. Overall, this research provided novel insights into the complex and context-dependent nature of grass defence systems. Silicon offered stronger protection against folivores, while endophyte-derived alkaloids were more effective against aphids. Interactions between fungal symbionts and silicon varied by plant species, fungal genotype, and herbivore type. These findings underscore the potential of harnessing natural plant–microbe–silicon interactions to enhance grass resilience against a range of biotic stressors, offering valuable insights for the development of more sustainable forage systems.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Rights granted to the New Zealand Grassland Association through this agreement are non-exclusive. You are free to publish the work(s) elsewhere and no ownership is assumed by the NZGA when storing or curating an electronic version of the work(s). The author(s) will receive no monetary return from the Association for the use of material contained in the manuscript. If I am one of several co-authors, I hereby confirm that I am authorized by my co-authors to grant this Licence as their agent on their behalf. For the avoidance of doubt, this includes the rights to supply the article in electronic and online forms and systems.



