Dairy systems study of the effects of contrasting spring grazing managements on pasture and animal production

Authors

  • G.J. Bishop-Hurley
  • P.N.P. Matthews
  • J. Hodgson
  • C. Dake
  • C. Matthew

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33584/jnzg.1997.59.2243

Abstract

This paper reports the results of a dairying systems study at No. 4 Dairy, Massey University, investigating whether the benefits of contrasting spring grazing managements previously measured in small-scale experiments could be measured within the management constraints of a selfcontained farm production system. Management contrasts were early control (EC), in which pastures were closely controlled throughout spring and summer, with average pasture cover kept at approximately 2000 kg DM/ha, and late control (LC), in which average pasture cover was increased to 2700 kg DM/ha, allowing some reproductive growth through October and November before returning average pasture cover to 2000 kg DM/ha in December. Average pasture cover and pre- and post-grazing cover differences between treatments were achieved over late spring in all three years. However, average pasture cover during summer did not differ between treatments. Milksolids (MS) production per cow during the spring phase was higher for the LC treatment than for EC, but the differences disappeared over the December control phase and overall differences were small and inconsistent. The use of mechanical topping in December 1995/96 reduced the penalty to LC MS production experienced in previous years. Late control spring grazing management did not significantly increase pasture or MS production within the confines of a closed production system, contrary to the results of previous small-plot and paddock-scale experiments. Keywords: dairy cow, dairy systems, Lolium perenne, milksolids production, pasture production, spring grazing management, Trifolium repens

Downloads

Published

1997-01-01

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 > >>