The evaluation of a controlled release nitrogen fertiliser
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33584/jnzg.2015.77.469Abstract
Experiments in the laboratory, glasshouse and in the field assessed the chemical and agronomic characteristics of four polymer-coated urea products manufactured to different specifications, by altering the number and chemical nature of the coatings. (The chemical and physical nature of the coatings and the coating process are the property of the New Zealand distributor, Eko 360 Ltd.) They are claimed to be controlled release nitrogen (N) fertilisers. The N release characteristics of the experimental products were measured, relative to water soluble urea, in the laboratory in the absence of soil. These results confirmed that the N release rates were consistent with the distributor's specifications and were slower than urea. A glasshouse experiment was designed to use N uptake by ryegrass as a proxy for the N release rate in a soil. These results confirmed those from the laboratory, indicating that soil had little effect on the relative N release characteristics of the fertilisers. The experimental product with the slowest release rate was selected for evaluation in the field. In three field experiments the effect the experimental product, applied once at two rates, on pasture production was compared with the same rates of N applied once as urea, over 5-6 months. The experimental product tested increased N use efficiency (NUE, kg DM/kg N applied) by between 5-50% depending on the site and rate of N application. Thus it is concluded that the products are as claimed - contolled release N fertilisers, relative to urea - and that this characteristic is expressed under field conditions. Proof-of-concept was therefore established. Keywords: fertiliser, nitrogen, nitrogen use efficiency, pasture, SmartFertTM, ureaDownloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Rights granted to the New Zealand Grassland Association through this agreement are non-exclusive. You are free to publish the work(s) elsewhere and no ownership is assumed by the NZGA when storing or curating an electronic version of the work(s). The author(s) will receive no monetary return from the Association for the use of material contained in the manuscript. If I am one of several co-authors, I hereby confirm that I am authorized by my co-authors to grant this Licence as their agent on their behalf. For the avoidance of doubt, this includes the rights to supply the article in electronic and online forms and systems.